Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Wendy Priestnitz. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Wendy Priestnitz. Afficher tous les articles

jeudi 21 mars 2013

A Life of Learning & Passion, an exclusive interview with grown unschooler André Stern

A Life of Learning And Passion
An interview with grown unschooler and professional musician André Stern
By Edith Chabot-Laflamme, J'OSE la vie !
Original version, in French, is here.
Translation: Edith Chabot-Laflamme
Revision: Catherine Forest and Jean-François Roldan
First published in Life Learning Magazine, Sept-Oct.2012 issue 
Thanks to Wendy Priestnitz

André Stern, his wife Pauline, and their son Antonin by Isabelle Latournerie © 2012.
André Stern is a French musician who grew up without schooling. The interview was conducted by telephone in French in July 2012. The interviewer was in Quebec City, Canada and Stern was in Avignon, France. Stern has written about his unschooled life in two books, available in German, published by Editions Zabert Sandmann (Und ich war nie in der Schule, 2009 - 6thedition, and Mein Vater, mein Freund, 2011).
The first one has been translated into French under the title ...Et je ne suis jamais allé à l'école, published by Actes Sud, 2011. He and his family are featured in this unchoolig news report: www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUey77MKDV8&f.
For more information: http://www.andrestern.com/

On tour in Quebec, Canada: After several lectures in Europe, Andre Stern will also be visiting Quebec in May 2013; for more information, including states and locations, as well as reservations, please visit: http://andrestern.ca

***

Edith: André Stern, you've never been to school, you hold several jobs, you are married and the father of a little boy, how's it going for you today?

Andre: Very well! My childhood, my last forty-one years of childhood and their events are doing very well. I am happy. Of course, this includes the challenges, crises, obstacles, everything that is related to a normal life; I'm not someone who does not know reality of the world. But I am happy. I dare to say it: I'm a happy child.

André Stern as a child - courtesy Arno Stern Institut, Paris.

Edith: You are on tour in Avignon. Are you with your family?

Andre: Voila! We are in Avignon, the three of us together. We have been coming here since 1999. Now, with Antonin, we have a different organization, we follow a different rhythm. We manage to organize our family life. Our little family of three, the extended family of six, and the great theater family now have a new member called Antonin.


Edith: How old is Antonin?

Andre: Antonin is two and a half; he was born in December 2009.


Edith: Do your occupations always allow you to travel with your family?

Andre: Not always with family. There are sometimes many kilometers to cover. We travel a lot, mainly in Europe but also in India, in Africa. We always try to travel as a family, although this is not always possible. For example, recently I had to take four planes and four TGVs [high-speed trains] in four days, which is not something you want a two-year-old child to go through.

As for the trades that I practice, I add a nuance. I find it hard to differentiate trades and hobbies, jobs, livelihoods and dreams; life and learning; family and professional life. It's all very separate in some people but, to me, that is not the case at all. This concept is pretty vague. I practice these occupations that make me very happy; I did not have restrict myself to a single profession, a single direction. Many things are connected. Many occupations have emerged along the way. There are all those occupations that I've always wanted to perform, and some others I do not refer to as professions. Currently, here in Avignon, I am a guitarist, a composer and a performer. I am the co-director, with Giancarlo Ciarapica, of a theater company. We are in Avignon for the theater and music festival. Currently, my occupations are, in order: guitarist, luthier [stringed instrument maker], author, and journalist.

I am also director of the collective "Des hommes pour demain" ["Men for tomorrow"], initiated by Prof. Dr. Gerald Hüther, advanced neurobiology researcher.

Beyond that, I also work with computers, machines, and devices. And I am a close colleague of my father, along with my sister: it is a very wide work that can be described as a job. But right now, my main occupation is being a father: observing, taking note, sharing the childhood of my child.

André Stern as a child - courtesy Arno Stern Institut, Paris.

Edith: Your parents offered you the choice - it is indeed a choice – not to go to school. Your book describes a continuity of your parents' lives in the life of this couple welcoming a child, a cohesion with their respective life experiences. Did you feel it ? How have you experienced that?

Andre: I don't know if it was a choice for me; it was their choice. It is wonderful that parents make choices - this was what drove me to carry this testimony. For most parents, in France, there is no choice: everyone starts with the principle that children must attend school. (And here I must specify that I do not work against school; I work hand-in-hand with people who do school.) What is heartening, is that after reading my book a parent knows the spectrum of possibilities. As for me, I think it is wonderful to be the son of parents who have made choices, but maybe our son will want to go to school. Choice and freedom are different things. One must not give only a choice, one must also give freedom. For example, if we offer a vegetarian the choice between pork and beef, there is a choice, but there is no freedom; there is no freedom to choose what matches his convictions.

Parents make choices, this is where originates the odors, the colors of the home, which is more important than its geography. For my parents, not sending me to school was not an option but the only possible thing. They were both brilliant students - this is not about personal suffering; they had no score to settle with the school. They acted according to their convictions. Mon père, mon ami [My Dad, my friend] is the book (published in German) I wrote with my father where we describe this continuity. He is the son of his father; I am the son of mine. I am moved and delighted that my son was born in this family, in a great continuity, in the presence of my parents (that's how life has made it). I am very grateful to have met with a woman such as Pauline, who shares the same convictions. She doesn't adopt mine; it is not a mutual adaptation, but an encounter. Seeing Antonin evolving, seeing my son with my father is a continuity that is watermark in my life. I live this belatedly, at 41, this is how events have occured in my life.

André Stern as a child - courtesy Arno Stern Institut, Paris.


Edith: When we read your book, we feel this complicity between your parents, a common choice to provide the support, the environment, the tools, to find interesting people who are interested in your passions. What is their philosophy? Or is it rather a lifestyle?

Andre: There is no philosophy, no method. Lifestyle would be closer, but it's mostly and particularly an attitude.

My parents were moved, they saw us grow up, walk, talk, without educational intervention, without prompting, each one at his/her own pace. They still are moved now that they're living a second wave with Antonin and approach his childhood with a tenfold confidence. Their main attitude is observation. In the observation position, one is protected from making mistakes. We no longer have time to think. Driven by curiosity, I observe what will be the next natural step in the spontaneous disposition of the child, in his development, rather than seeking how I could induce the next step.

Anecdote: Antonin began to say: "2, 4, 6." Why? We don't know. When he was hearing a number, he was replying: "2, 4, 6." We are very curious to see what will be the next step. In the world of others, which is not always like ours although we are part of it, someone was a little shocked to see him, beaming, repeating ''2, 4, 6.'' He told us: "You can not let him make such a mistake; he mispronounces, he doesn't count properly. It is your responsibility to show him." He told Antonin: "We must say 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6...."

I rely on modern neurobiology: The child turns to his primary reference persons: his parents. The child expects from them an approval, a green light. It falls within the child. We have a huge responsibility: it is for us to give his spontaneous disposition the acquiescence that he expects; we validate and then all other influences have no hold on him.

So Antonin looked at him and replied: "2, 4, 6." Later, he began to say: "1, 3, 4, 6."

The child has such a desire, such a need for approval, for reference, that he is ready to give up his spontaneous disposition on behalf of whatever receives a good reception from his referees (parents). We can allow the child to develop in his own disposition, or impose our own way: What a huge responsibility!

We knew that, if we did not intervene, another step would come after 2, 4, 6. We want to ensure that his evolution is his personal evolution, and not the result of our intervention. That's what has always driven my parents.

Another part of the attitude involves enthusiasm. Neurobiology tells us of exciting things. I will summarize the history of neurobiology. It was initially thought that we, humans, have different types of brains: fast, slow, stupid, smart. This was convenient and we created categories like under-talented, gifted, etc. Permanently. Some wise guy even had the idea (it was thankfully not pursued!) to sterilize people with an IQ level below a certain figure, to prevent them from reproducing.

In fact, brain develops depending on the use one makes of it. A first discovery showed that the brain area that controls the movement of the thumbs is three times more developed among fifteen-years-oldss of today than of thirty years ago. Do you have an inkling about this? Of course, that's because of texting. Stunning discovery. As a result, scientists decided to treat the brain like a muscle, to make it really big. Since the area that deals with the thumbs has tripled in size, they invented a program to triple the volume of the brain.They tried to have kindergarten children learn five languages, but to their great disappointment, it didn't work.

The key discovery they then made is something we all have always known : The brain develops where it is used with enthusiasm!

Analysed now by scientists, the process is quite clear: enthusiasm acts as a fertilizer for the brain. Where we act with enthusiasm, the brain develops in a spectacular and automatic way. Neurobiology has taken years to prove what we all know by instinct and experience: Enthusiasm is the key. In a state of enthusiasm, nothing is longer inaccessible, learning happens "all by itself". Do you know that small children experience a surge of enthusiasm about every three minutes? In adults, such a surge of enthusiasm arrives only two to three times a year! Children are born as full of enthusiasm. We have no idea what happens when a child grows undisturbed in this primordial and primary state of enthusiasm. My luck - this is anything but a personal merit - is that I can bring new and decisive answers about it.

Now that we agree on the crucial aspect of this necessity, it is good to know that enthusiasm takes time. When, for example, I read an author or when I learned German for 6 hours in a row, nobody came after fifty minutes (the average length of a course in a classroom setting) to tell me that it was over. When we live our enthusiasm over time and with confidence, we deepen our knowledge and understanding, logically, every day. And I was able to experience that this has a spectacular side effect, which is competence.

When we are enthusiastic, our competence increases at high speed. And do you know that competence also has a side effect? It is called achievement, success!

We are ready to trample others, to sacrifice our life in the name of success. We have unlearned many things in the name of success, which is nothing but the side effect of competence, which is, in turn, the side effect of enthusiasm. That's it! What is sold as an end in itself is just a side effect of the side effect of enthusiasm.

André Stern as a child - courtesy Arno Stern Institut, Paris.

Edith: When you were very young, already, your dad gave you a guitar. In the book, you say that for your parents, music is vital, but that they don't play any instrument. You see in this gift a calling, an implicit request?

Andre: Not at all! This was part of what they offered me, like tools, trucks, cars, all sorts of things. The guitar was very important in flamenco, which my father liked. But it was not even a proposal, it was a gift. When you offer a truck to your child, it does not mean you want him to become a trucker.


Edith: So, you have not experienced this omnipresent consumer mentality that is in our culture, where the parent wants to see that what he spent money on is actually being used by his child?

Andre: When you live with your child, it is hard to go wrong on his enthusiasms; my parents noticed that my head was stuck on the floor when someone was playing the guitar on the floor below. If I offer planes to Antonin whenever I see one we like, it is because he loves airplanes, and motorcycles, and cars. And big trucks! That's it! I know he is passionate about those. But if I offer him a sewing kit, it's not what interests him now. By living with them, by observing, we put ourselves from the many mistakes we could make. In fact, we don't have to organize but to be carried away by each other's enthusiasm. And most importantly, every time we try to organize something (sorry for the noise, I'm on the street now, Avignon is loud, I will soon take a quieter street... voila ! you're still there, Edith? - Yes, yes, I am!), we risk imposing our ideas. We therefore avoid great disappointments. The best thing to do is to let go, to not have expectations. This is what protected my parents, not to have expectations.

Anecdote: Antonin loves trucks. I found him a 62 cm long truck, and gave it to him. He said: "ohhhhh!" And he played non-stop for three days with ... the package! We must have this open mind. (He laughs heartily!)

Another anecdote: When I was five or six years old - I wrote about it in the book (note: p. 44) – my dad takes me to the planetarium, and we shared this enthusiasm - him, about things in the sky, and me, about the way things work in the planetarium. Neurobiology calls this "shared attention" - we are together without necessary looking in the same direction.

André Stern, by Pauline Stern

Edith: You speak about photo - and about many other subjects which fascinated you - and make a distinction between learning, autonomous exploration, from specialists' opinion. How important was it to you, as a child, to explore by yourself, at your own pace?

Andre: Because of this I have done things with vehemence, at my own pace, in my own way. Sometimes I took complex detours, as a result, I have never forgotten what I learned. It was not always a straight line, but it was my path. That said, I did not invent the world of topics like string-instrument making or photography. But to have the incredible luck to be under the aegis of the best guitar maker in the world was beyond my craziest dreams! No dream is really inaccessible. After bumping into closed doors with lots of his colleagues, Werni said: "I can show you everything, but I cannot teach you anything." It was wonderful! I did not invent this trade, I did not learn just to pass an exam. What I learned has remained imprinted on me, I have not forgotten anything because it was my path. Such as when I met the number pi. It was complex, I wanted to calculate my truck's speed. I have believed in the pi figure only when I had the strip of paper wrapped around the wheel. It was easier to apply the formula instead of checking on my own. My process was less direct, slower, more complicated, but it was mine and so far it has served me well.

André Stern with Werner Schär - courtesy andrestern.com

Edith: In your book you write about visiting specialty stores, feeling uncomfortable, people looking at you like you were an alien. Some unschoolers say they are looked at that same way sometimes. However, you also say that something in you was on the right track and you seemed pretty sure of yourself when you were really just leaving the teenage years behind. Did your parents help you with that?

Andre: Actually, it wasn't just when I was a teenager. I didn't experience any teenage crisis. The crisis exists only in a certain frame; without the frame, it does not exist.

That look of which I speak, I saw it in the shops, yes, but not in normal life. In normal life, children are more open-minded than we think. For a child, who runs faster, jumps higher, is larger or smaller, are the differences they really are when we do not impose comparison. I've always been a happy member of this society. I lived a life-sized socialization: When one is not confined with people of the same age and lives with many different people, one learns to do things with one another, to combine experiences, competencies, rather than to compete. In the large social bath in which I was immersed, it was much more important to do things with each other rather than against each other. I've never felt different because I live in a world of difference. There was always someone to show me something, or someone to whom I could show some other thing. That eliminates the gap between generations. It does not occur to an elderly person to compare herself to a child; she would rather share enthusiasm. This is precisely what is rewarding. What has led me to my friends is neither our age nor where we live; it is our communities of interest!

If I felt on rails about guitar, it was due to my reference persons, my parents, who gave the green light to who I am, to my process. It is an important role to be the reference person, to have the intention to validate the spontaneous disposition of the child. With neurobiology, we are protected from the discomfort of feeling different; feeling different is desirable, there is no attempt to unify things, to make them alike.

André Stern, luthier - Tamins, Suisse - courtesy andrestern.com

Edith: Your structured learning time began when you were twelve or thirteen years old - guitar lessons, and later, English, algebra, copperware, weaving, dance activities. Was that your request?

Andre: That was always part of my life, with a stronger presence at that age. It was not a structure that I requested; it was neither an organization of my learning; it flowed naturally, stemmed from the rest. There is no freedom without structure. For example, a personal rule may be to play the guitar six hours a day; a family structure may be to wash your hands before eating, or to eat together; a social structure is to drive on the right side of the street. We need structure. And if the algebra class was on Wednesday at 2pm, it was useless to go there on Sunday at 10am. It is a structure that a child understands very well and which reassures him and, precisely, gives him a sense of freedom.


Edith: Your mom accompanied you to Egyptology lessons. For photography and copperware, she discreetly looked for a workshop, an open-minded professional who welcomed you without academic method. This discretion on the part of both of your parents seems to have been an important underlying element in this life without school.

Andre: Discretion is important, yes, like when you have an uncle who is passionate about ties and you conspire all together to surprise him: everyone brings him a tie. It’s the same thing for the beer bottle caps collector. We remain attentive, if we see something interesting, we offer it to him. Freed from expectations, which are deleterious, we can put ourselves in our child's position.


Edith: I come back to music for a moment. People often wonder how to nurture their child's musical talent. They wonder if unschooling provides enough discipline and rigor to prepare for a professional career in music. What do you think about this?

Andre: I never start from me but always from the child. If parents listen to music, or if they play music, the child is steeped in music, but that does not mean he will play music. I would never try to win the child to one of my preferences. If it starts with him, then it's not necessary to try to nurture the child's interest; it just happens, by enthusiasm.

As for discipline, this question makes me laugh. Learning takes place because of the interest we have for things; self-discipline arises from the pleasure one has from doing these things. We believe, wrongly, that discipline is a framework imposed from the outside, that it requires a system that forces the child to do something, to practice. However, the natural discipline comes from the child, from within. It grows out of pleasure and curiosity.

For example, when I practiced the guitar six hours in a row, I was the one who imposed my discipline, my pace, onto my family.

Another example: Antonin is listening to two minutes of Mozart's The Magic Flute. At one point, we see him reacting to the sound of the little bells. He enjoys it and after, he moves a little, he has less desire to be there; then, all of a sudden, he hears the sound of the bells again. So he knows that this sound he appreciates will come back and he is ready to sit still and to wait to hear it again.

It is at this very moment that he is learning self-discipline: "If I sit for two minutes longer, I will have the pleasure of hearing the bells once again," which leads him to want to stay four more minutes, then eight minutes, it's exponential. At his pace, at his own time, he chooses to listen for two more minutes. Now, he listens and watches The Magic Flute every day, Every day! This is an extreme discipline. At one-and-a-half years old, listening and watching The Magic Flute every day is a very high level of discipline – or just natural enthusiasm fully experienced.


Edith: I don't know how it is in France, but here in Quebec, in Canada, in America, (I want to stress that here, we don't know much about unschooling), people have lived within this framework which have been imposed on them, and often they don't come to break free from it and free their children from it.

Andre: One simply has to start from the child, everything becomes simple and enthusiasm becomes "contagious"!


Edith: Your grandfather seemed to be very present, as well as your uncles, some friends of your parents, and also their children. Was this circle a part of the environment your parents offered you? Did they already have their support?

Andre: Not necessarily, there were many doubts on behalf of certain members of the family. Ineradicable convictions are not necessarily shared. But from the moment each person sees that, carried by enthusiasm, there is no need to worry about our children, then, things change.

Arno Stern and André Stern in India - courtesy Arno Stern Institut, Paris.

Edith: Did you ever compare your life with those of other friends or young people of your age?

Andre: What I was seeing of school life was not very tempting. The children never had time to play, they had homework after school ... and as soon as they learned that I was not going to school, they all told me, ''How lucky you are!"


Edith: Did any of your friends test you?

Andre: It has never happened. I repeat it: children are far more open than we think. What matters to a child is to play. And they take note of differences. They did not quantify, nor qualify them.


Edith: Your book is also a call to freedom, and to confidence. You are addressing an adult audience, especially parents, perhaps also teenagers. Do you think parents are lacking confidence in their children?

Andre:This is what characterizes most parents. They believe that if they do not educate their children, they will become illiterate and asocial savages. Yet children are extremely competent. Children are born with the best, the most suitable, and most amazing of learning devices ever invented: play. From then on, there is only room for confidence. Ah! If only you knew how simple things are!

I am talking about extreme competence of the child, the learning capacity of the child, at five years old as well as at eighty-five years old, he has the same capacity of learning. The only thing that defines this enthusiasm is that it leads to competence and then to success. There is nothing more to worry about. I sometimes talk to people who have no qualifications, no diploma, and I tell them that qualifications are not needed but competence is, and that this is the result of enthusiasm. Enthusiasm is free, available to everyone.

I am a practical illustration of the weight of confidence. We must tell this story, so that parents see how much we have to trust children.


Edith: Did your parents or yourself feel any social pressure ?

Andre: Never! Absolutely not. When we feel confident, we naturally move away from people who have different convictions and/or different attitudes, we can choose our friends, like they choose us, by affinity.


Edith: Do you have your own philosophy of life? If so, what is it?

Andre: No. Neurobiology is not a philosophy. It is a support, an indispensable asset. It is not a philosophy, it is an attitude, it is the same as my parents. It is to be in common life, in curiosity, together. Observing. Curious for the next step, not desiring to introduce the next step.

André Stern, by Pauline Stern

These words, which summarize very well the attitude of Andre Stern, conclude the interview.
Andre, thank you very much for granting me this interview while you are in the middle of the Avignon Festival. Thank you for your generosity!

Edith Chabot-Laflamme
J'OSE la vie !

mercredi 29 août 2012

Mon interview avec André Stern dans Life Learning Magazine !!!

Je suis ravie et fière de vous annoncer que mon interview avec André Stern est publiée dans le numéro de septembre-octobre 2012 du Life Learning Magazine qui sort aujourd'hui ! Six pages (12 à 17), wow ! Et regardez-moi la photo de cette famille souriante et heureuse, une photo magnifique prise spécialement pour cette interview ! 
Pauline, Antonin et André Stern - photo: Isabelle Latournerie - 2012
Mise à jour 6 sept. 2012: l'interview est maintenant disponible en français, ici.

Ajout: Le Magazine VIVRE a publié un article que j'ai écrit à partir de cette interview, dans le numéro de novembre-décembre 2012. Il est disponible ici.
---
Si vous êtes abonnés, lisez-la vite, et écrivez-nous vos commentaires. 
Si vous ne l'êtes pas (comment est-ce possible?;-)) abonnez-vous vite, ou au  moins achetez ce numéro et, s'il-vous-plaît, lisez mon interview avec André Stern! (Vous sentez mon enthousiasme ici, n'est-ce pas ? Contagieux? J'ose croire que oui !)

Je désire remercier Wendy Priestnitz, qui m'a offert cette opportunité de publier cette interview exclusive, une première en Amérique. Merci, Wendy et Rolf, de Life Media.

Merci, André Stern, de m'avoir accordé si généreusement de ton temps, malgré un horaire chargé alors que tu es en tournée en Europe.

Cette interview - tout comme le livre d'André Stern (''...Et je ne suis jamais allé à l'école'') - est très importante pour moi, et je suis persuadée qu'elle le sera aussi pour tous les lecteurs, unschoolers ou non, pour tous les parents, pour tous les enfants.
Je suis si heureuse. Merci beaucoup !
Je termine avec mes premiers remerciements:

Je désire remercier nos fils, que nous avons appelés à venir partager notre vie, Stéphane et moi. Ces enfants, qui par leur soif de respect, de vérité et de liberté, ont dû lutter contre l'école dans ma tête trop souvent, contre les pressions sociales qui nous tenaient aussi parfois, et dont ce n'était pas le rôle d'ouvrir le monde pour leurs parents. Grâce à votre persévérance, votre force intérieure, votre courage aussi, vous avez osé être qui vous êtes, et demandé plus et mieux, une vraie vie vivante, celle à laquelle vous avez droit, celle à laquelle chacun a droit. Et du coup, en vous accordant plus de liberté et de vie, je me suis reconnectée à la vie en moi. Vous êtes les personnes les plus aimantes, les plus aimables, et les plus respectueuses que j'ai jamais rencontrées. Vous êtes pour moi une source d'inspiration de tous les instants, vous êtes dans chacun des choix de vie que je fais, une inspiration à oser suivre mes enthousiasmes, à suivre mon chemin, à être qui je suis. Et je suis engagée à toujours faire plus et mieux, à faire un meilleur choix à chaque instant, afin que vous soyez respectés dans ce que vous êtes, chacun, et que vous ayez toujours accès à cette vraie vie d'apprentissage autonome et de joie dont parle André Stern dans cette interview. Je vous aime de tout mon coeur !
Edith
 
P.S. Merci aussi d'avoir accepté de rire moins fort dans la cuisine pendant que je faisais cette première interview par téléphone avec André Stern, le 24 juillet dernier.
Love !
***

I am pleased and proud to announce that my interview with Andre Stern is published in Life Learning Magazine, September-October 2012 issue, out today! Six pages (12 to 17), wow! And look at that picture of this family smiling and happy, a beautiful and exclusive photo by Isabelle Latournerie for this interview!

If you're a subscriber, read it quickly, and, please, send us your comments.

If you're not (how is that possible? ;-)) subscribe quickly, or at least buy this issue and, if you please, read my interview with Andre Stern! (You can feel my enthusiasm here, isn't it? Is it contagious? I would think yes!)

I want to thank Wendy Priestnitz, who gave me the opportunity to publish this exclusive interview, the first one in America, the first one in English too. Thank you Wendy, and Rolf, from Life Media.

Thank you, Andre Stern, for giving me so generously of your time, despite a busy schedule while you're on tour in Europe.

This interview - just like Andre Stern's book is very important to me, yes, and I'm sure it will also be very important to all readers, unschoolers or not, all parents, and all children.

I'm so happy. Thank you very much!

I finish with my first thanks:


I want to thank our sons we called to share our lives, Stephane and me. These children, by their thirst for respect, truth and freedom, these children who too often had to fight against the school in my head, against the social pressures that kept us sometimes, and that this was not their role to play to open the world's doors for their parents. Due to your perseverance, your inner strength, your courage, you dared to be who you are, and asked for more and better, for a real life, this life that which you are entitled to, this life that which everyone is entitled to. And so, by giving you more freedom and life, I reconnected myself to my life too. You are the most loving, kindest, and the most respectful persons I have ever encountered in my life. You are for me a source of inspiration in every moment, you are part of every life choices that I make, an inspiration dare to follow my enthusiasm, my own path, to be who I am. And I am committed to always do more and better (''when you know more, you do more, when you know better, you do better'', thanks Erika Davis-Pitre!), to make a better choice at every moment (thanks Sandra Dodd, for those words of wisdom), so that you are respected in what you like, in who you are, each of you, and to help you always have access to this life of autonomous learning and happiness Andre Stern is talking about in this interview.
I love you with all my heart!


Edith

PS Thanks also for agreeing to laugh less stronger in the kitchen while I was making this first telephone interview with Andre Stern, in July.
Love!

mercredi 9 mai 2012

pas d'école du tout - John Holt

"Ce qui est le plus important et précieux à propos de la maison comme base pour la croissance des enfants dans le monde n'est pas que ce soit une meilleure école que les écoles, mais que ce ne soit pas une école du tout. Ce n'est pas un lieu artificiel, mis en place pour que «l'apprentissage» se produise et dans lequel rien d'autre que «l'apprentissage» ne se produit jamais. " 
John Holt (Teach Your Own, 1981)
Cité par Wendy Priesnitz, sur facebook, le 6 mai 2012 
Traduction: Édith - Les Éditions JOSE
Citation originale en anglais:
"What is most important and valuable about the home as a base for children's growth into the world is not that it is a better school than the schools but that it isn't a school at all. It is not an artificial place, set up to make 'learning' happen and in which nothing except 'learning' ever happens." John Holt (Teach Your Own, 1981)
 
 
 

dimanche 4 décembre 2011

Notre survie pourrait bien dépendre des enfants qui ne sont pas allés à l'école

Traduction : J'OSE la vie !
« Encore une fois, j'ai entendu le terme «anarchie» employé à tort pour décrire un incident de vandalisme, violence et chaos qui aurait été perpétré par des «anarchistes». En réalité, l'anarchie peut être définie comme une société sans gouvernement populairement reconnu ou autre autorité centrale. Et cela, la plupart des gens supposent que ça entraînera automatiquement le vandalisme, la violence et le chaos.

Pourquoi pensent-ils cela? La plupart des gens ne peuvent tout simplement pas imaginer vivre sans hiérarchie, lois, dirigeants et autorités qui leur disent quoi faire et comment le faire. De la même façon, la plupart des adultes ne peuvent pas croire que les enfants sont capables de gérer leur propre vie et apprentissage sans la direction d'un adulte. Nous ne faisons simplement pas confiance, ni à nous-mêmes, ni aux autres, y compris nos propres enfants, à vivre paisiblement et de manière productive sans se faire dire quoi faire.

Nous avons été amenés à être des disciples qui font ce que nous disent une classe d'experts et de dirigeants - dans nos familles, églises, écoles et autres institutions. Comme je l'ai écrit dans Challenging Assumptions in Education, la ligne d'assemblage de l'école nous a conditionnés à penser que toute chose plus difficile que choisir quelles marques acheter doit être laissée à des «experts». Nous soigner nous-mêmes est irresponsable, construire nos propres maisons est impossible, l'apprentissage autonome n'est pas fiable, et s'organiser au sein de nos communautés est subversif.

Nous expérimentons ces jours-ci le chaos - économiquement, écologiquement et socialement. Saurons-nous jamais trouver le bon gouvernement, parti politique, ou chef qui réparera tout pour nous ? Probablement pas. En fait, nous avons peut-être simplement à prendre les choses en main, comme beaucoup de gens autour du monde l'ont fait, de différentes façons. Et beaucoup de gens trouvent que ça fait peur. Par exemple, l'utilisation par le mouvement Occuper d'outils tels que la prise de décision après consensus et l'absence de porte-parole est aussi frustrante pour de nombreux observateurs qu'elle est importante pour son existence et son message. Nous ne sommes pas habitués à une participation active et à la résolution de problèmes, et nous trouvons souvent effrayant ce qui ne nous est pas familier.

Toutefois, nous avons besoin de développer ces outils et bien d'autres afin de trouver un moyen de sortir du chaos que ma génération a créé. Et ceux qui grandissent sans école et avec leurs capacités actives de questionnement, l'estime de soi, l'autonomie, et d'autres qualités importantes intactes sont les plus aptes à le faire. » ~Wendy Priestnitz

vendredi 14 octobre 2011

Impuissant devant l'injustice ? Envie que ça change ? Occupons Québec demain

Ce midi, nous ouvrons courriels, blogs, facebook: tout est relié, comme presque chaque jour de notre vie. Aujourd'hui, il s'agit de la colère. De la colère que chacun de nous vit, qui naît de l'injustice comme le dit Wendy Priestnitz ici.
Naomi Klein en parle aussi ici. Voici un extrait:

« Je vous aime.
Et je ne dis pas cela pour que des centaines d’entre vous me répondent en criant « je vous aime ». Même si c’est évidemment un des avantages de ce système de  microphone humain. Dites aux autres ce que vous voudriez qu’ils vous redisent, encore plus fort.
Hier, un des orateurs du rassemblement syndical a déclaré : "Nous nous sommes trouvés." Ce sentiment saisit bien la beauté de ce qui se crée ici. Un espace largement ouvert – et une idée si grande qu’elle ne peut être contenue dans aucun endroit – pour tous ceux qui veulent un monde meilleur. Nous en sommes tellement reconnaissants.
S’il y a une chose que je sais, c’est que les 1 % [les plus riches] aiment les crises. Quand les gens sont paniqués et désespérés, que personne ne semble savoir ce qu’il faut faire, c’est le moment idéal pour eux pour faire passer leur liste de vœux, avec leurs politiques pro-entreprises : privatiser l’éducation et la Sécurité sociale, mettre en pièces les services publics, se débarrasser des dernières mesures contraignantes pour les entreprises. Au cœur de la crise, c’est ce qui se passe partout dans le monde.
Et une seule chose peut bloquer cette stratégie. Une grande chose heureusement : les 99 %. Ces 99 % qui descendent dans les rues, de Madison à Madrid, en disant : "Non, nous ne paierons pas pour votre crise." »
Michael Moore, après son très juste documentaire "Le capitalisme, une histoire d'amour", supporte lui aussi ce mouvement.

Demain, samedi le 15 octobre, se veut jour historique. Un site web recense les villes et pays où les humains se rassembleront pour faire changer les choses.

Pour ceux et celles qui veulent faire quelque chose, qui veulent au moins essayer, se joindre à un mouvement plus grand, international, lisez ci-dessous, l'invitation qui est faite sur http://occuponsmontreal.org/.



Une manifestation s'organise aussi à Québec: on peut en prendre connaissance sur la page facebook de Occupons Québec. Dès demain, et chaque samedi par la suite, il y aura une occupation de la Place d'Youville.



Vous pouvez lire ici la traduction française de la Déclaration de l'occupation de Wall Street, dont voici un extrait: 
Exercez votre droit de s’assembler paisiblement, d’occuper l’espace public, de créer un processus pour résoudre les problèmes auxquels nous faisons face, et de générer des solutions accessibles à tous.
Ça nous semble particulièrement à propos et intelligent comme idée. Se rassembler pour émettre des pistes de solutions, oui, pourquoi pas ?

Ici, un extrait audio d'une entrevue à la radio de Radio-Canada, à propos du mouvement Occupons Québec.

Tous ensemble pour la vie !
Nous ne savons pas du tout ce que nous pouvons espérer de ce mouvement, de cette journée que l'on veut historique, de la suite aussi car l'occupation commence le 15 octobre mais dans le but de se poursuivre car, pour travailler ensemble, il faut être ensemble, ou comme le dit Naomi Klein: "pour que des racines poussent, il faut rester longtemps". Évident. Nous ne savons pas si nous y serons chaque samedi mais nous allons commencer par faire un pas. Nous sommes parfois en colère, et il est vrai que cette colère est générée par l'injustice.... non, pas tout à fait... en réalité, cette colère est générée par ce sentiment d'impuissance que nous vivons presqu'en permanence face à l'injustice dans notre monde. Allons donc essayer quelque chose de nouveau en utilisant cette énergie puissante qu'est l'indignation lorsqu'on la garde vivante afin d'agir, comme le disait Pierre Rabhi lors de son passage à Québec.

Essayons au moins: y'a rien à perdre et tout à gagner! Vous viendrez aussi?
JOSE

En colère ? Indignés ? Que faire ?

Angry? (13 Octobre 2011) par Wendy Priestnitz (suivi d'un billet par Édith)
Traduction: Les Éditions J'OSE la vie !

J'OSE la vie ! - https://journaljose.blogspot.com
flou
« Êtes-vous en colère aujourd'hui? La personne qui attendait derrière moi dans la ligne à la banque l'était. La caissière l'était. La personne qui m'a coupé parce que je ne conduisais pas assez au-dessus de la limite de vitesse l'était. La jeune maman qui traînait sa fille en sanglots par le bras sur la rue l'était. Le volume de colère mal dirigée dans ma boîte de courriels me donne envie de ramper sous le lit. Le voisin de palier a eu un air renfrogné sur son visage pendant des semaines.

J'ai une théorie sur le fait que nous sommes nombreux à sentir une mauvaise humeur générale née de l'inquiétude et qui se transforme en colère floue contre tout et n'importe quoi sur notre chemin. Dans de tels moments d'anxiété, la peur de l'avenir peut sembler écrasante. Nous sommes alors un peu vite à émettre des jugements, un peu plus impatient, plus facilement frustré. En plus, beaucoup d'entre nous vivons à une vitesse folle, essayant de caser trop de choses dans des journées frénétiques à l'horaire trop serré pour laisser du temps si quelque chose allait mal, ou si on souhaite tenir à notre façon de faire. Encore moins pour respirer.



J'OSE la vie ! - https://journaljose.blogspot.com
plus clair
"La colère est un signal qu'il vaut la peine d'écouter", écrit Harriet Lerner dans The Dance of Anger. Dans tout, de nos relations personnelles aux transactions commerciales à l'état du monde, la colère peut être un signe utile indiquant que quelque chose cloche. Et ce quelque chose est souvent l'injustice. Malheureusement, beaucoup d'entre nous sommes trop occupés et trop en colère pour en chercher la véritable cause et faire quelque chose pour que ça change. Plus souvent qu'autrement, nous refoulons la rage à l'intérieur de nous ou nous nous en prenons à quiconque est sur notre chemin (et l'un conduit parfois à l'autre).


"Ceux d'entre nous qui sont enfermés dans des expressions inefficaces de la colère souffrent aussi profondément que ceux d'entre nous qui n'osons pas nous mettre en colère du tout", nous rappelle Lerner. Donc, l'astuce est de trouver la vraie cause de notre colère, et ce qui serait une expression efficace de cette colère. Il est plus facile de rager derrière un pare-brise ou un avatar web que de ralentir et de confronter les vrais problèmes. Comme nous l'avons vu dans de nombreux pays cette année - regardez aujourd'hui à Wall Street - la colère peut être utilisée comme un outil de changement puissant et efficace. Mais pendant que nous faisons cela (que ce soit dans la sphère publique ou privée), s'il vous plaît n'oublions pas de prendre une profonde respiration, de sourire, et de rester calme et concentré. » ~Wendy Priestnitz
***************
J'OSE la vie ! - https://journaljose.blogspot.com
ajouter de la lumière
Récemment, une professionnelle de la santé m'a expliqué la colère comme étant la réaction physiologique qui suit la pensée. Une énergie (puissante) qui naît dans le corps à la suite d'une pensée. Il s'agit vraisemblablement de l'explication biologique. Elle me disait qu'elle déplorait le fait que trop souvent, depuis trop longtemps, on présente la colère comme une émotion qui doit être exprimée à tout prix, rapidement. Il est plus approprié de conserver cette énergie pour agir plutôt que de la disperser à tout va, et ainsi la perdre. Mais pas par la répression, surtout pas. J'ai vérifié lorsque des pensées ont fait surgir cette émotion en moi et effectivement, si je prends le temps de la reconnaître et de la conserver pour agir, je crois que mes actions sont plus appropriées. Bon, je ne dis pas que j'ai atteint l'illumination mais je vais mieux ainsi.


C'est différent des façons de 'vivre' la colère auxquelles nous avons été exposés par le passé. Nous avons vécu la répression: se faire dire (avec ou sans mots) de se taire, de ne pas exprimer sa colère, réprimer les émotions ressenties pour ne pas 'dé-ranger', taire tous les sujets sur lesquels on n'arrive pas à trouver de solutions car ce n'est pas politiquement correct, nous a-t-on dit souvent, de parler d'une problématique si on n'a pas, au préalable, trouvé de solution... !  Ça nous a toujours paru suspect comme idée, pire encore s'il s'agit d'un idéal de vie, et particulièrement erroné en ce sens que si personne n'ose parler de ce qui ne va pas, comment quelqu'un pourra-t-il se pencher sur le sujet pour tenter d'émettre des pistes de solution et les essayer? Cette répression des émotions, c'est la rage refoulée dont Wendy parle ici. 


L'autre approche - en fait c'est souvent la suite de la précédente - que nous avons rencontrée fréquemment dans les plus ou moins dix dernières années, c'est le fameux 'positivisme' que certaines personne appellent aussi 'pensée magique'. C'est de ça qu'on parle lorsqu'on dit de quelqu'un qu'il porte des lunettes roses. Et cette approche tout en faux semblant est celle de, justement, faire semblant. Voir le beau côté des choses (oui, bien sûr, on est tous d'accord) ... et fermer les yeux sur le reste (là, par contre...), faire semblant que ça va bien quand ça va mal, quand on se sent mal, même - ou surtout - devant le mal-être et l'injustice. Il s'agit d'un jeu mais d'un jeu dangereux, à notre avis. 


Ça me rappelle La vie est belle, le film de Roberto Benigni. J'aime ce comédien et je respecte son cinéma mais, lorsque j'ai vu son film (il y a bien longtemps) j'ai ressenti une profonde douleur. Bien que l'humour qu'utilise le père devant son fils à certains moments puisse avoir un noble but, cette mascarade m'a laissé avec un goût amer devant le mensonge et le subterfuge utilisé par un pauvre parent opprimé et sans aucun soutien social - et assassiné à la fin, comme le furent de nombreuses personnes par les sous-fifres d'un dictateur fou. :-( Je ne juge pas le message qu'a voulu passé ce cinéaste, et jamais je ne voudrais avoir à vivre, comme parent (ou pas) ce genre de situation sociale d'une existence où l'horreur côtoie la non-vie partout. 


Dans notre famille, nous ne voulons pas de ce positivisme ambiant de faux-semblant, celui que nos fils ont rejeté avant nous - eux qui sont depuis toujours assoiffés de justice et de vie - alors que 1% des humains sur notre planète gère les ressources, l'existence et l'air respiré par 99% de leurs semblables. (Bon, pour les chiffres, c'est plutôt symbolique, hein !) Et nous sommes certains que nous ne sommes pas les seuls...


La suite, dans un instant !


Edith